Robotedge Rocket Camp Skool Review (2026)

The owner’s Skool account is four and a half months old. The community already holds 983 members, 5,950 posts and 38 reviews.

Both of those things are true at once, and reconciling them is most of the work in this review.

A disclosure up front. I am not a member of Robotedge Rocket Camp and nothing has been paid to Pablo Llobregat Ruiz by this site. What follows comes from the community’s public Skool About page, the written reviews Skool restricts to paying members, and the founder’s public profile, captured on 9 September 2026. Everything from the sales copy is labelled as the seller’s claim.

Quick Decision

Join if you read Spanish, you are already trading prop firm accounts, and you want daily live sessions with a group working the same funded-account challenges. One hundred and three people online out of 983 is the highest live share in this set, and daily classes at $99 a month is a lot of contact time.

Hold off if you want a founder with a checkable history. This account is four and a half months old and the audit claim names nobody. Hold off too if the money you would put into challenge fees is money you need.

Current terms sit on the Robotedge Rocket Camp listing.

Twenty-Three Courses And 140 Modules

One hundred and forty modules across 23 courses is about 6 modules each. That shape suggests short focused units rather than long masterclasses, which suits a method built on rules and calculations.

Five admins for 983 members is one staff account per 197. That is reasonable at $99 and it supports the promise of daily question answering.

The activity number is the standout. One hundred and three people online is 10.5% of the membership at a single moment. Most communities of this size show 1% to 3%. Daily live classes explain it, and they are the part of this listing that a free YouTube channel cannot replicate.

The seller describes the contents as an instant action plan for prop firm accounts, basic algorithmic trading training, live funded-account sessions and daily doubt resolution. Two bonuses are named as annual-only: a strategy the page describes as more than 50% annual return, and a mathematical calculator for prop firms. No annual price is published anywhere, which leaves those bonuses unbuyable as far as the About page shows.

Everything Here Happens In Spanish

The description, the sales page, the founder’s bio and all three visible reviews are in Spanish. Nothing indicates an English track.

This is not a criticism. It is a filter. If your Spanish is not strong enough to follow a live trading class at speed, the 140 modules do not exist for you.

The community calls itself a hermandad, a brotherhood, and the reviews use the same word. The social frame is central to what is being sold, and social frames only work in a language you think in.

Pablo Llobregat Ruiz Joined Skool In April

His account dates to 23 April 2026. Capture was 9 September 2026. That is 139 days.

In that window the community reached 983 members and 5,950 posts. Growth that fast is impressive and it is also the reason to slow down. There is no cohort here that has been through a full year, no member who joined two summers ago, and no long record of what happens after month six.

His bio says he is an algorithmic trader who went from 1.2K to more than 48K with a method based on data and statistics. No currency is stated. No date range is given. No account type is named. The sales copy adds that he lost his savings to a fake influencer before applying his university data analysis studies to trading, which is a story rather than a credential.

He publishes one public link, an Instagram profile. The location field is empty. His profile carries a crown badge, which Skool awards on owner earnings and which says nothing about member results.

For a subject where the whole pitch rests on the founder’s numbers, one Instagram account and an empty location field is a thin record.

The Word “Audited”, And The Name That Is Missing

The bio ends with three words that do heavy lifting: todo ello auditado. All of it audited.

No auditor is named. No firm, no report, no verification service, no date, no scope. A trading record can be audited by a third party, and when it is, the auditor is the first thing a serious operator names.

The sales copy also links a results page hosted on robotedge.tech, the seller’s own domain. Self-published results are marketing. They can be true, and they carry no independent weight.

Ask directly before joining: who performed the audit, on which account, over what period, and can the report be read? That question costs nothing and the answer tells you most of what you need.

Ninety-Nine Dollars A Month, Recorded Twice

Skool’s structured price field holds 99 US dollars on a monthly interval, and the join button reads JOIN $99/month. Two independent records agreeing is better than most listings manage, and it counts in the community’s favour.

A year at that rate is $1,188. No refund policy, trial or annual plan appears on the page.

The membership is not the whole cost. Prop firm trading means paying an evaluation fee to a funding company, failing some of those evaluations, and paying again. The listing publishes no challenge cost, no pass rate among members, no drawdown limit and no statement that most evaluation accounts fail.

The seller’s headline says you can squeeze $2,000 a month out of prop firms with the mathematical method. That is the seller talking. No member review names a funded account, a payout or a monthly figure. Nothing on this page tells you what you would earn, and nobody should expect to earn anything.

Budget the $99 and the evaluation fees as one number before deciding.

Thirty-Eight Reviews, And What They Are Rating

The average is 4.9 across 38 reviews. That 4.9 matters: a perfect record would read 5.0, so at least one member scored it lower. Skool only accepts reviews from paying members, so none of these were bought.

Three bodies are visible, all written on 7 or 8 September 2026, one and two days before capture. One member writes that they hope this path leads to the financial freedom they want, and says they will leave their impressions as they go (a member review on Skool, September 2026). Another describes large long-term expectations and says being surrounded by other beginners with normal doubts pushes them to improve (a member review on Skool, September 2026). A third says they like the brotherhood but have only just started trading, with a lot of work ahead (a member review on Skool, September 2026).

Read what those three have in common. Every one is written by someone at the beginning, and every one describes an expectation rather than an outcome. One says so explicitly.

That is the single most important finding on this listing. Thirty-eight five-star-leaning reviews sound like proof. The visible sample is people rating their hope in week one, which is the least predictive moment in any trading education.

None of the visible reviews names a passed evaluation, a funded account, a payout or a loss.

Walk Away If

• You want a long track record. The founder’s Skool account is 139 days old at capture.
• You need the audit to mean something. The bio says audited and names no auditor or report.
• You do not read Spanish fluently. Every module, class and review is in Spanish.
• You cannot afford to lose evaluation fees. No pass rate, challenge cost or drawdown rule is published.

My Verdict

The price and the activity earn what it scores. Ninety-nine dollars is recorded in two places, which removes any ambiguity about what you pay. One hundred and three members online out of 983 is a 10.5% live share, the highest here, and daily classes plus 5 admins for 983 members means the contact time is real. One hundred and forty modules across 23 courses is a working library.

The weak points are about evidence. The founder’s account is four and a half months old, he publishes one Instagram link and no location, and his bio claims an audit without naming an auditor. That combination is the finding I would weigh most. The 1.2K to 48K figure carries no currency or date. Every visible review was written by a self-described beginner in the two days before capture, describing hope rather than a result, and none mentions a funded account or a payout.

Watch the free video and read the Instagram history first. If you join, spend the first week asking who ran the audit and what the members’ evaluation pass rate has actually been. For another Spanish-language community at the same $99 price, but with 160 reviews behind it, read our La Tribu Divisual review, and the Affiliate Marketing Launchpad review covers a route to income that does not require risking evaluation fees. The listing is here.