MiNT MVMT | Window Cleaning Skool Review (2026)

One hundred and twenty-seven members. Nine admins. One thousand, nine hundred and ninety-seven dollars a month.

Those three numbers explain almost everything about MiNT MVMT, including the parts the sales page does not spell out.

A disclosure before anything else. I am not a member of this community and no money has changed hands with Gatlin McBride or his team. Everything below comes from the community’s public Skool About page, the written reviews that only paying members can leave, and the founder’s own public channels, all captured on 9 September 2026. Where a figure comes from the seller’s own copy rather than Skool’s data, I say so.

Quick Decision

Join if you already own a window cleaning or home service company with revenue coming in, you can absorb $1,997 a month as a business expense, and your bottleneck is pricing, hiring and systems rather than getting your first customer. At that stage, nine admins for 127 owners is real access, and the room is full of people solving the same problem you are.

Hold off if you are starting out, if the fee would come from personal savings, or if you want to browse the material before committing. There is no trial, no published refund window, and no way to see inside until you are approved and paying.

You can check the current listing terms on the MiNT MVMT page before you apply anywhere.

The Room Is 127 People, And That Is The Design

Nine admin accounts across 127 members is one staff account per 14 people. That is the strongest ratio I have found in this price band, and it is the single best argument for the fee.

Compare it honestly. Communities charging $184 a month run one admin per 1,262 members. Here you are one of fourteen people each admin is responsible for. If the promised Voxer line works the way the copy describes, that ratio is what makes it possible.

The feed holds 2,809 posts from 127 members, about 22 posts each. Six people were online at capture, roughly 4.7% of the membership.

What a small room costs you

Small is not automatically good. A 127-person network gives you fewer case studies to learn from, fewer markets represented, and fewer people awake when you post at 11pm.

If your main reason for joining a paid group is the volume of peers, this is the wrong shape of product. The value here is concentrated in the staff and the structure, not in the crowd.

Twelve Courses Built Around Three Phases

The listing shows 202 modules across 12 courses, an average of about 17 modules per course.

The seller organises them into what the page calls the MiNT Model, in three named phases. Drive Leads covers marketing and sales systems meant to fill the calendar without agencies or door knocking. Stack Plans covers pricing, offers, agreements and the sales pitch. Build Team covers hiring and training technicians.

That is a sensible order for a home service business. Leads, then margin, then labour. Most owners hit those walls in exactly that sequence.

The claims attached to each phase

Read the phase descriptions as marketing, because that is what they are. The page states the team used this system to grow MiNT past $2M, that the pricing and pitch material took them past $100k MRR, and that trained technicians clean $1,500 a day with no callbacks.

None of those figures carry a source, a date range or an audit. They may all be accurate. They are not checkable from outside the community, so they should carry no weight in a $1,997 decision.

The page also describes the offer as a four month programme with training, systems and support, plus weekly group calls where the team reviews your numbers, a Voxer line to the team, and an internal KPI app called Mora. Those are deliverables you can ask about directly. Do that.

Two videos on the listing

Skool records 2 videos on the public listing and the gallery is empty. For a $1,997 product, there is not much to look at before you decide.

That is not a scandal. Private communities often keep their material behind the door on purpose. It does mean the free evidence you can gather sits almost entirely on the founder’s own channels.

Gatlin McBride’s Public Trail

Gatlin McBride has run this community on Skool since November 2024, about 22 months at the capture date. His profile describes him as a 28 year old founder of multiple home service brands doing multiple seven figures, and says he is setting a new standard for home service.

Three public links sit on the profile: Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube. That is a real transparency win. You can watch his YouTube material for free, form a view on whether the teaching is any good, and only then decide whether the paid version is worth $1,997 a month.

I would spend a full evening doing that before filling in any application. If the free content does not teach you something concrete about pricing or hiring, the paid version will not either.

The gaps on the profile

No location is listed. For a business that sells local home service operations, knowing which market the founder built in matters. Pricing, labour costs and seasonality are not the same in Phoenix as in Manchester.

His Skool account also carries a crown MRR badge, which marks a high-earning community owner on the platform. That tells you the community sells well. It says nothing about whether members get results.

The $1,997 Line, Read Carefully

The join button read JOIN $1,997/month on the capture date, and Skool’s own price record confirms $1,997 per month in US dollars. Both sources agree, which is better than most listings manage.

Now do the arithmetic the page does not do for you. The copy calls this a four month programme, so the stated run costs $7,988. Stay a year and you are at $23,964.

That is a serious number for a home service owner. At a 20% net margin, a business needs roughly $120,000 in additional annual revenue just to cover a year of membership.

What the price does not include

No annual plan. No trial. No published refund policy of any kind.

Cancellation terms are not described on the listing either, though Skool memberships are generally month to month. Because the door is an application rather than a checkout, the terms you actually sign may differ from anything visible publicly.

Get the refund position in writing before you pay. If nobody will state it, price the risk at the full $1,997 and decide anyway.

The 30% commission behind the coverage

MiNT MVMT pays affiliates 30%. On $1,997 a month that is $599.10 per member per month, recurring.

A referral who stays the four month programme is worth about $2,396 to whoever sent them. That is among the largest per-member payouts on the platform, and it is why enthusiastic write-ups of this community are easy to find. This review earns nothing from it.

The Door Is An Application, Not A Checkout

The listing is private and the description opens by telling you to apply at an external website rather than to join on Skool.

This cuts both ways. Selection keeps the room to owners with real revenue, which is exactly what a $1,997 peer group needs to be worth anything. Nobody is paying that fee to sit next to someone who has not cleaned a window yet.

The cost is visibility. You cannot preview the 202 modules, read the feed, or watch a call recording before committing. Every meaningful piece of evidence about the product sits behind a door you can only open with money.

Treat the application call as your inspection. Ask what the four months actually contain week by week, what happens in month five, what the Voxer response time is in practice, and what the refund position is if you decide it is wrong for you in week two.

Thirty-Five Reviews, All Five Stars

Thirty-five written reviews at a straight 5.0 average, from 127 members. That is a 27.6% response rate, several times higher than most communities manage.

Skool only accepts reviews from paying members, so none of these can be bought or automated. A high response rate from a small paid room is the most useful review signal in this category.

Three are worth reading. One member writes that the group changed their life and calls MiNT the best (a member review on Skool, August 2026). Another praises the range of owners at different stages and their willingness to give advice freely, ending on the community’s own slogan about being the standard (a member review on Skool, August 2026). A third calls joining a no-brainer decision and one of the best they have made (a member review on Skool, August 2026).

The most-recent review is a long comic tribute to the founder, written in the style of a national honours citation. It is funny. It also contains no information about the product.

What 35 five-star reviews do not tell you

Not one visible review names a revenue figure, a margin improvement, a hire made, or a number of jobs booked.

For a programme that sells lead systems, pricing frameworks and hiring processes to business owners, those are precisely the outcomes a buyer needs and they are absent. The reviews establish that members like the room and rate the founder. They do not establish a hit rate.

There is a second blind spot. Members who quit a $1,997 programme rarely stay to write about it, so a perfect average across 35 entries describes the people still inside.

Don’t Join If

• Your business is pre-revenue. $1,997 a month should come from profit, not from savings or a card.
• You want to browse first. The application gate means no preview of the 202 modules or the feed.
• You need a big peer network. This room is 127 people, and it is meant to be.
• You will not attend the calls. Weekly group review is the delivery mechanism, so skipping it removes most of what you paid for.

My Verdict

I score MiNT MVMT 3.7 out of 5.

The staffing is the reason it scores as well as it does. Nine admins for 127 members is one per fourteen, and at this price that ratio is what you are actually buying. The three-phase structure matches the order in which home service owners genuinely get stuck, 202 modules is a real library rather than a handful of webinars, and a 27.6% review rate from paying members is stronger evidence than a bigger community with a thinner response.

Two deductions, and both are about what you cannot see. The listing publishes no refund policy, no trial and no annual option on a fee that reaches $23,964 a year, and the application gate means you commit before you can inspect anything. The founder claims of $2M in revenue and $100k MRR carry no source, and the profile does not even name a market.

Watch the free YouTube material, then use the application call as an audit rather than a sales conversation. If the refund position and the week-by-week plan both come back clear, the price is defensible for an owner with revenue. For a sense of what a mid-priced community delivers on the same access promise, read our AI Profit Boardroom review. The Affiliate Marketing Launchpad review shows the opposite end of the scale, where the door is open to anyone. If you decide the fit is right, start from the listing itself.